State v. . Wilson
20 S.E.2d 273, 221 N.C. 365, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 471
Opinion
A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that there was ample evidence — direct and circumstantial — to support the verdict. The allowance of an amendment of the warrant after the cause reached the Superior Court was within the discretion of the court.
The defendant’s assignments of error fail to point to any harmful or prejudicial error. Hence, the verdict and judgment must stand.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. . Wilson, 20 S.E.2d 273, 221 N.C. 365, 1942 N.C. LEXIS 471 (N.C. 1942).
20 S.E.2d 273 (State v. . Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Moore
101 S.E.2d 26 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
State v. Wilson
75 S.E.2d 924 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
State v. Carpenter
231 N.C. 229 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
State v. . Brown
33 S.E.2d 121 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)