State v. Wilson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Wilson

386 S.W.3d 203, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1451, 2012 WL 5866492

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 20, 2012·No. No. ED 97324·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Kip Wilson appeals from the trial court’s judgment sentencing him on convictions for misdemeanor driving while intoxicated and resisting a felony arrest. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no error in entering its judgment and sentence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Kip Wilson appeals from the trial court’s judgment sentencing him on convictions for misdemeanor driving while intoxicated and resisting a felony arrest. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no error in entering its judgment and sentence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Wilson, 386 S.W.3d 203, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1451, 2012 WL 5866492 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

386 S.W.3d 203 (State v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.