State v. Wilson

120 S.W.3d 250, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1703, 2003 WL 22434142
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Wilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1261
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 28, 2003·No. No. ED 82424·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Phillip L. Wilson (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction of one count of possession of a controlled substance, Section 195.202, RSMo 2000, for which Defendant was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment with the execution of sentence suspended and placed on five years of probation. Defendant contends the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress and admitting methamphetamine evidence seized from Defendant because Defendant did not consent to the search and the police officer did not have reasonable suspicion that Defendant was armed and therefore, was not authorized to pat down Defendant.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wilson, 120 S.W.3d 250, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1703, 2003 WL 22434142 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

120 S.W.3d 250 (State v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.