State v. Wilson
This text of 493 A.2d 1060 (State v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
The defendant was convicted of gross sexual misconduct, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253(1)(A) (1983), after a jury trial in the Superior Court (Androscoggin County). The only claim on appeal is that the evidence of his identification as the perpetrator was insufficient as a matter of law to support the conviction. After a careful review of the record, we find that the jury rationally could have found proof of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. See State v. Durgan, 467 A.2d 165, 166-67 (Me.1983); State v. McKenney, 459 A.2d 1093, 1096 (Me.1983).
Therefore, the entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
493 A.2d 1060, 1985 Me. LEXIS 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wilson-me-1985.