State v. Wilson

493 A.2d 1060, 1985 Me. LEXIS 738
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided June 12, 1985·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

The defendant was convicted of gross sexual misconduct, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253(1)(A) (1983), after a jury trial in the Superior Court (Androscoggin County). The only claim on appeal is that the evidence of his identification as the perpetrator was insufficient as a matter of law to support the conviction. After a careful review of the record, we find that the jury rationally could have found proof of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. See State v. Durgan, 467 A.2d 165, 166-67 (Me.1983); State v. McKenney, 459 A.2d 1093, 1096 (Me.1983).

Therefore, the entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wilson, 493 A.2d 1060, 1985 Me. LEXIS 738 (Me. 1985).

493 A.2d 1060 (State v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Durgan
467 A.2d 165 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1983)
State v. McKenney
459 A.2d 1093 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1983)