State v. Wilson
108 P. 119, 82 Kan. 858, 1910 Kan. LEXIS 359
Opinion
This case might properly be dismissed for the reason that the alleged transcript of the record is not so certified [859]*859as to show that it is a true copy of the record. Assuming, however, that it is a true transcript, we have examined it as to all the errors assigned, and do not find any substantial or prejudicial error in the proceedings of the court.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Wilson, 108 P. 119, 82 Kan. 858, 1910 Kan. LEXIS 359 (kan 1910).
108 P. 119 (State v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Russell v. Cogswell
101 P.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1940)