State v. Wilmoth

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Wilmoth

520 S.W.2d 185, 1975 Mo. App. LEXIS 1907

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 28, 1975

DocketNo. 9937

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 520 S.W.2d 185 (State v. Wilmoth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wilmoth, 520 S.W.2d 185, 1975 Mo. App. LEXIS 1907 (Mo. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has purported to appeal from the trial court’s revocation of his probation.

Appellant’s jurisdictional statement states: “Appellant pleaded guilty of tampering with a trailer, a felony .... Imposition of sentence was suspended and defendant was placed on supervised probation. During his probationary period, defendant was arrested and charged with first degree burglary. The Court held a hearing and revoked defendant’s probation and sentenced defendant. This appeal is to contest the correctness of the Court’s revocation order.”

The right of appeal is statutory [Rule 81.01, V.A.M.R.], and § 549.141, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., bars our review by direct appeal of the revocation of appellant’s probation. State v. Camden, 514 S.W.2d 181 (Mo.App.1974).

Determining, sua sponte, that we have no appellate jurisdiction, appellant’s appeal is dismissed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI