State v. Wilmering

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Wilmering

543 S.W.3d 672

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 10, 2018·No. WD 80555·Published

Opinion

Per curiam:

Appellant Casey Wilmering ("Wilmering") appeals his conviction for five counts of forgery following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. On appeal, Wilmering alleges that the trial court erred in overruling his Motion for Judgment of Acquittal because the State failed to present sufficient evidence that Wilmering actually or constructively possessed the forged documents. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam:

Appellant Casey Wilmering ("Wilmering") appeals his conviction for five counts of forgery following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. On appeal, Wilmering alleges that the trial court erred in overruling his Motion for Judgment of Acquittal because the State failed to present sufficient evidence that Wilmering actually or constructively possessed the forged documents. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Wilmering, 543 S.W.3d 672 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

543 S.W.3d 672 (State v. Wilmering) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.