State v. Wilmering

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Wilmering

543 S.W.3d 672

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 10, 2018

DocketWD 80555

StatusPublished

This text of 543 S.W.3d 672 (State v. Wilmering) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wilmering, 543 S.W.3d 672 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam:

Appellant Casey Wilmering ("Wilmering") appeals his conviction for five counts of forgery following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. On appeal, Wilmering alleges that the trial court erred in overruling his Motion for Judgment of Acquittal because the State failed to present sufficient evidence that Wilmering actually or constructively possessed the forged documents. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam:

Appellant Casey Wilmering ("Wilmering") appeals his conviction for five counts of forgery following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. On appeal, Wilmering alleges that the trial court erred in overruling his Motion for Judgment of Acquittal because the State failed to present sufficient evidence that Wilmering actually or constructively possessed the forged documents. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

543 S.W.3d 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wilmering-moctapp-2018.