State v. Willis

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Willis

523 S.W.3d 490, 2017 WL 1149641, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 213

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 28, 2017

DocketNo. ED 103841

StatusPublished

This text of 523 S.W.3d 490 (State v. Willis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Willis, 523 S.W.3d 490, 2017 WL 1149641, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 213 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Calvin Willis (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment following a jury trial convicting him of one count of unlawful possession of a firearm, in violation of Section 571.070 (RSMo. 2000), and one count of resisting arrest, in violation of Section 575.150. Appellant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to 15 years’ imprisonment for unlawful possession of a firearm and time served in the St. Louis Medium Security Institution for resisting arrest.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Calvin Willis (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment following a jury trial convicting him of one count of unlawful possession of a firearm, in violation of Section 571.070 (RSMo. 2000), and one count of resisting arrest, in violation of Section 575.150. Appellant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to 15 years’ imprisonment for unlawful possession of a firearm and time served in the St. Louis Medium Security Institution for resisting arrest.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

523 S.W.3d 490, 2017 WL 1149641, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-willis-moctapp-2017.