State v. Willis

663 So. 2d 392, 1995 WL 579988
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided October 4, 1995·No. Cr 95-316·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

663 So.2d 392 (1995)

STATE of Louisiana
v.
Antonio Fernandez WILLIS.

No. Cr 95-316.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

October 4, 1995.

Richard Phillip Ieyoub, Baton Rouge, Morgan J. Goudeau III, Opelousas, Donald J. Richard, Asst. Dist. Atty., for State.

Herschel Glenn Marcantel Jr., Mamou, for Antonio Fernandez Willis.

Before COOKS, WOODARD and AMY, JJ.

COOKS, Judge.

Defendant, Antonio Willis, was charged by bill of information with possession with intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance (schedule II—cocaine) in violation of La.R.S. 40:967(A)(1). Willis was found guilty as charged by a jury. He was sentenced to serve five years at hard labor, six months of which was suspended. On appeal, Willis contends his sentence is excessive. However, we note an error patent in the sentencing.

Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 893 allows a trial judge to suspend imposition or execution of a sentence after a first or second conviction for a noncapital felony, but defendant must be placed on probation. The record shows Willis was not placed on probation as required by Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 893. The mandatory probation requirement of this provision compels that we must vacate Willis' sentence and remand the case for resentencing pursuant to Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 893. See State v. Fann, 597 So.2d 1230 (La.App. 3 Cir.1992).

SENTENCE VACATED AND CASE REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Willis, 663 So. 2d 392, 1995 WL 579988 (La. Ct. App. 1995).

663 So. 2d 392 (State v. Willis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Louisiana v. Scott Robert Swank
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2023
State of Louisiana v. Ernest R. Billiot
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2014
State ex rel. S.M.
67 So. 3d 1274 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2011)
State in the Interest of S M
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2011
Cathcart v. State
916 A.2d 1008 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2007)
State v. Honeycutt
823 So. 2d 1089 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2002)
State v. Helou
822 So. 2d 647 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2002)
State v. Bazar
758 So. 2d 844 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2000)
State v. Ramirez
684 So. 2d 52 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)