State v. Willingham

192 S.E.2d 39, 16 N.C. App. 439, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1734
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 25, 1972
DocketNo. 7212SC698
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 192 S.E.2d 39 (State v. Willingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Willingham, 192 S.E.2d 39, 16 N.C. App. 439, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1734 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Judge.

We have reviewed the record in this case and find it to be free of any prejudicial error. The defendant was afforded a trial which was fair and free of error. The bills of indictment, pleas, judgment and sentences were in all respects regular and proper.

No error.

Judges Morris and Parker concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Image Mills, Inc. v. Vora
245 S.E.2d 882 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 S.E.2d 39, 16 N.C. App. 439, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-willingham-ncctapp-1972.