State v. Williard Croom
This text of State v. Williard Croom (State v. Williard Croom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT JACKSON FILED JANUARY 1998 SESSION February 9, 1998
Cecil Crowson, Jr. JAMES WILLARD CROOM, ) Appellate C ourt Clerk ) NO. 02C01-9703-CC-00104 Appellant ) ) LAKE COUNTY VS. ) ) HON. R. LEE MOORE, JR., BILLY COMPTON, WARDEN, ) JUDGE ) Appellee. ) (Habeas Corpus)
FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:
JAMES WILLARD CROOM (Pro Se) JOHN KNOX WALKUP #235162 Attorney General and Reporter L. C. R. C. F. Route 1, Box 330 ELIZABETH T. RYAN Tiptonville, TN 38079 Assistant Attorney General Cordell Hull Building, 2nd Floor 425 Fifth Avenue North Nashville, TN 37243-0493
C. PHILLIP BIVENS District Attorney General P. O. Drawer E Dyersburg, TN 38025-2005
OPINION FILED:
AFFIRMED - RULE 20
JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE ORDER
Petitioner, James Willard Croom, sought habeas corpus relief in the Circuit
Court of Lake County alleging that his drug indictment was fatally insufficient for
failure to state the appropriate mens rea. Pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of
Criminal Appeals, we AFFIRM the trial court’s dismissal of the petition.
In his petition for writ of habeas corpus the petitioner alleged that the drug
indictment leading to his conviction and sentence was insufficient in charging that
he “did unlawfully possess with intent to sell or deliver a controlled substance, to-wit:
cocaine....” He specifically alleges that this language fails to charge the appropriate
mens rea and is, therefore, void.
We find that the language of this indictment provided adequate notice to both
the defendant and the trial court of the offense alleged and is not deficient. State
v. Hill, 954 S.W.2d 725 (Tenn. 1997).
The judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED pursuant to Tennessee Court
of Criminal Appeals Rule 20.
____________________________ JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE
CONCUR:
________________________________ JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE
________________________________ PAUL G. SUMMERS, JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Williard Croom, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-williard-croom-tenncrimapp-2010.