State v. Williamson

226 N.E.2d 735, 10 Ohio St. 2d 195, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 231, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 392
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 10, 1967
DocketNo. 40714
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 226 N.E.2d 735 (State v. Williamson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Williamson, 226 N.E.2d 735, 10 Ohio St. 2d 195, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 231, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 392 (Ohio 1967).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Here, we have a situation where the notice of appeal was placed in the prison mail room seven days before the final date for filing. The notice was then out of the control of the appellant. Due to the delay occasioned by the adminis[196]*196trative processes of the prison it did not reach the Court of Appeals until the filing date was past.

Section 2953.23, Revised Code, provides that an order denying postconviction relief “may be appealed pursuant to Chapter 2505 of the Revised Code.” Section 2505.07, Revised Code, provides that “the period of time within which” an appeal to the Court of Appeals shall be perfected is “within 20 days.” Section 2505.04, Revised Code, states that “an appeal is perfected when written notice of appeal is filed with the lower court,” and that thereafter “no step required to be taken * * * is jurisdictional.”

In our opinion, a defendant incarcerated in prison and acting without the aid of counsel files his notice of appeal in time, if, within the 20-day period specified in Section 2505.07, Revised Code, he delivers such notice to the proper prison authorities for forwarding to the court. In such a case, the jailer in effect represents the lower court within the meaning of Section 2505.04, Revised Code. We believe that such a conclusion is required by Fallen v. United States (1964), 378 U. S. 139.

The motion to certify is allowed, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for a hearing upon the merits.

Judgment reversed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O ’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Smith
2020 Ohio 1370 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
State v. Garrett, 06 Be 67 (12-28-2007)
2007 Ohio 7212 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
State v. Lester, 2-07-23 (10-22-2007)
2007 Ohio 5627 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
State v. Harris, Unpublished Decision (3-3-2005)
2005 Ohio 921 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
State v. Owens
698 N.E.2d 1030 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1997)
Amon v. Ohio State Medical Board
586 N.E.2d 1165 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1990)
State v. Westfall
346 N.E.2d 282 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1976)
State v. Ratliff
251 N.E.2d 633 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1969)
State v. Anderson
228 N.E.2d 312 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 N.E.2d 735, 10 Ohio St. 2d 195, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 231, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-williamson-ohio-1967.