State v. Williams

Washington Supreme Court

State v. Williams

432 P.3d 778, 192 Wash. 2d 1014

Washington Supreme Court·Decided January 9, 2019·No. No. 96456-4·Published

Opinion

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its January 8, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 The Petitioner's motion for extension of time is granted. The petition for review is denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its January 8, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 The Petitioner's motion for extension of time is granted. The petition for review is denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

State v. Williams, 432 P.3d 778, 192 Wash. 2d 1014 (Wash. 2019).

Pincite

432 P.3d 778 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.