State v. Williams, Unpublished Decision (3-2-2007)
This text of 2007 Ohio 998 (State v. Williams, Unpublished Decision (3-2-2007)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 2} App.R. 26(B) provides in part:
A defendant in a criminal case may apply for reopening of the appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence, based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. * * *
{¶ 3} In this matter, there was no appellate judgment announced or journalized that examined Williams' convictions or sentences inState v. Williams, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, Case Nos. CR-402485, CR-420549, and CR-431166. Rather, Williams is attempting to reopen an appeal from an adverse ruling on his petition for postconviction relief. Accordingly, this court is prevented from considering Williams' appeal pursuant to App.R. 26(B). State v.White (Mar. 22, 2001), Cuyahoga App. No. 78562, reopening disallowed (Sep. 28, 2001), Motion No. 27574; State v. Halliwell (Dec. 19, 1996), Cuyahoga App. No. 70369, reopening disallowed (Jan 29, 1999), Motion No. 00187; State v. Skaggs (May 12, 1999), Cuyahoga App. No. 76301, reopening disallowed (Sep. 21, 1999), Motion No. 7505; see alsoState v. Loomer (1996),
{¶ 4} Accordingly, Williams' application is denied.
JAMES J. SWEENEY, P.J., and COLLEEN CONWAY COONEY, J., CONCUR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2007 Ohio 998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-williams-unpublished-decision-3-2-2007-ohioctapp-2007.