State v. Williams
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent, v. Malcolm Antwon Williams, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-001175
Appeal From Marion County Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-092 Submitted January 1, 2019 – Filed February 20, 2019
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, and Malcolm Antwon Williams, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED. HUFF, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Williams (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.