State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Williams

DecidedFebruary 20, 2019

Docket2019-UP-092

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Williams (State v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Williams, (S.C. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Malcolm Antwon Williams, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2017-001175

Appeal From Marion County Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2019-UP-092 Submitted January 1, 2019 – Filed February 20, 2019

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, and Malcolm Antwon Williams, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI