State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Williams

DecidedJanuary 11, 2017

Docket2017-UP-027

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Williams (State v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Williams, (S.C. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Ivan Williams, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-002423

Appeal From Hampton County Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-027 Submitted November 1, 2016 – Filed January 11, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

James Arthur Brown, Jr., of Law Offices of Jim Brown, P.A., of Beaufort, and Ivan Williams, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Isaac McDuffie Stone, III, of Bluffton, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and KONDUROS and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI