State v. Williams

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Brenton Ray Williams, Appellant.

---

Appeal From York County
 Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge

---

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-432
Submitted September 1, 2009 – Filed September 9, 2009   

---

APPEAL DISMISSED

---

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Assistant Chief Legal Counsel John B. Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Brenton Ray Williams appeals the revocation of his probation. Williams argues the circuit court's decision to revoke his probation was arbitrary, capricious, and without evidentiary support, amounting to a denial of due process.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.

---

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.