State v. Williams

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 367 S.C. 192
Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided July 14, 2008·No. 2008-UP-383·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

State, Respondent,

v.

Donald Evan Williams, Appellant.


Appeal From Richland County
John L. Breeden, Jr., Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-383
Submitted July 1, 2008 – Filed July 14, 2008   


APPEAL DISMISSED


Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,  and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Donald Evan Williams pled guilty to petit larceny and burglary and received sentences of time served and five years, respectively.  He appeals his guilty plea, arguing there was not sufficient factual basis for the trial court to accept the plea.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Williams’ appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, A.J.J., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, (S.C. Ct. App. 2008).

State v. Williams (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. Williams
406 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1991)