State v. Williams
This text of State v. Williams (State v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
The State, Respondent,
v.
John Williams, III, Petitioner.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE
COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal From Greenville County
H. Dean Hall, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2004-MO-068
Heard December 7, 2003 Filed November 29, 2004
AFFIRMED
Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of S.C. Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, Senior Assistant Attorney General Harold M. Coombs, Jr., all of Columbia, and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.
JUSTICE WALLER: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals opinion in State v. Williams, Op. No. 2001-UP-324 (Ct. App. filed June 18, 2001). The sole issue on certiorari is whether Williams was entitled to a circumstantial evidence charge pursuant to State v. Edwards, 298 S.C. 272, 379 S.E.2d 888, cert. denied, 493 U.S. 895 (1989). This matter is affirmed in light of our opinion in State v. Cherry, Op. No. 25902, S.C. Sup. Ct. filed November 29, 2004, (Shearouse Adv. Sh. No. 46).
AFFIRMED.
TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT, JJ., and Acting Justice Reginald I. Lloyd, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-williams-sc-2004.