State v. Williams

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. Williams

110 S.E. 79, 118 S.C. 20, 1921 S.C. LEXIS 203

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedDecember 13, 1921

Docket10775

StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.E. 79 (State v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Williams, 110 S.E. 79, 118 S.C. 20, 1921 S.C. LEXIS 203 (S.C. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran. .

Appeal from a conviction of manslaughter. The error assigned is the refusal of defendant’s motion for a directed verdict in his favor.

It appears that the defendant shot the deceased with a pistol, the bullet puncturing the lower bowels, arteries, and hip, on July 26, 1920. The wounded man was taken to the Anderson Hospital, and was treated for two weeks, at which time he was discharged as apparently on the way to recovery. He returned to his home near Donalds, contracted pneumonia, and died on September 12, 1920. The physician who examined and attended him testified that he died of septic pneumonia superinduced by a gunshot wound which was possible, if not a probable, result of a wound such as he received. It is true that they testified that they could not swear that the wound caused the septic pneumonia, but this is not unusual or unnatural. The issue was squarely submitted to the jury as to whether or not the disease of which he died was produced by the wound. There was sufficient evidence upon this point for that disposition of the case. The motion to direct a verdict was therefore properly overruled.

The judgment of this Court is that the judgment appealed from.be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran. .

Appeal from a conviction of manslaughter. The error assigned is the refusal of defendant’s motion for a directed verdict in his favor.

It appears that the defendant shot the deceased with a pistol, the bullet puncturing the lower bowels, arteries, and hip, on July 26, 1920. The wounded man was taken to the Anderson Hospital, and was treated for two weeks, at which time he was discharged as apparently on the way to recovery. He returned to his home near Donalds, contracted pneumonia, and died on September 12, 1920. The physician who examined and attended him testified that he died of septic pneumonia superinduced by a gunshot wound which was possible, if not a probable, result of a wound such as he received. It is true that they testified that they could not swear that the wound caused the septic pneumonia, but this is not unusual or unnatural. The issue was squarely submitted to the jury as to whether or not the disease of which he died was produced by the wound. There was sufficient evidence upon this point for that disposition of the case. The motion to direct a verdict was therefore properly overruled.

The judgment of this Court is that the judgment appealed from.be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 S.E. 79, 118 S.C. 20, 1921 S.C. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-williams-sc-1921.