State v. Williams
167 P.3d 485, 214 Or. App. 690, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1261
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 197 Or. App. 21 →
Opinion
Defendant appeals his convictions for a variety of sex offenses, raising four assignments of error. We reject defendant’s first, third, and fourth assignments of error without discussion. Further, we reject defendant’s second assignment of error, pertaining to the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to require the state to make pretrial elections regarding the specific acts alleged in the indictment, based on the analysis set forth in State v. Magana, 212 Or App 553, 159 P3d 1163 (2007).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Williams, 167 P.3d 485, 214 Or. App. 690, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1261 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).
167 P.3d 485 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Magana
159 P.3d 1163 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)