State v. Williams

Oregon Supreme Court

State v. Williams

247 P. 1119, 118 Or. 684, 1926 Ore. LEXIS 120

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 Or. 238 →

Oregon Supreme Court·Decided July 20, 1926·Published

Opinion

McBRIDE, C. J.

The defendant having been duly-convicted of the crime of rape, he appealed, and was given various'extensions of time within which to file his transcript; the last extension being until June 15, 1926. Not having filed the transcript within that time, the state caused the transcript to be brought here, and asks for affirmation of the judgment as upon an abandoned appeal.

The motion must be granted, the judgment of the lower court affirmed, and the cause remanded to the Circuit Court, with directions to enforce its judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McBRIDE, C. J.

The defendant having been duly-convicted of the crime of rape, he appealed, and was given various'extensions of time within which to file his transcript; the last extension being until June 15, 1926. Not having filed the transcript within that time, the state caused the transcript to be brought here, and asks for affirmation of the judgment as upon an abandoned appeal.

The motion must be granted, the judgment of the lower court affirmed, and the cause remanded to the Circuit Court, with directions to enforce its judgment.

Affirmed.

State v. Williams, 247 P. 1119, 118 Or. 684, 1926 Ore. LEXIS 120 (Or. 1926).

Pincite

247 P. 1119 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.