State v. Williams

Oregon Supreme Court

State v. Williams

247 P. 1119, 118 Or. 684, 1926 Ore. LEXIS 120

DecidedJuly 20, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 247 P. 1119 (State v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Williams, 247 P. 1119, 118 Or. 684, 1926 Ore. LEXIS 120 (Or. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

McBRIDE, C. J.

The defendant having been duly-convicted of the crime of rape, he appealed, and was given various'extensions of time within which to file his transcript; the last extension being until June 15, 1926. Not having filed the transcript within that time, the state caused the transcript to be brought here, and asks for affirmation of the judgment as upon an abandoned appeal.

The motion must be granted, the judgment of the lower court affirmed, and the cause remanded to the Circuit Court, with directions to enforce its judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McBRIDE, C. J.

The defendant having been duly-convicted of the crime of rape, he appealed, and was given various'extensions of time within which to file his transcript; the last extension being until June 15, 1926. Not having filed the transcript within that time, the state caused the transcript to be brought here, and asks for affirmation of the judgment as upon an abandoned appeal.

The motion must be granted, the judgment of the lower court affirmed, and the cause remanded to the Circuit Court, with directions to enforce its judgment.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 P. 1119, 118 Or. 684, 1926 Ore. LEXIS 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-williams-or-1926.