State v. Williams

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Williams

844 N.E.2d 1192, 108 Ohio St. 3d 532

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 19, 2006·No. Nos. 2004-1320 and 2004-1699·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Threatt, 108 Ohio St.3d 277, 2006-Ohio-905, 843 N.E.2d 164, and the judgments of the trial court denying appellee’s motions to waive court costs and to vacate the order of garnishment are reinstated.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in State v. White, 103 Ohio St.3d 580, 2004-Ohio-5989, 817 N.E.2d 393.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Threatt, 108 Ohio St.3d 277, 2006-Ohio-905, 843 N.E.2d 164, and the judgments of the trial court denying appellee’s motions to waive court costs and to vacate the order of garnishment are reinstated.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in State v. White, 103 Ohio St.3d 580, 2004-Ohio-5989, 817 N.E.2d 393.

State v. Williams, 844 N.E.2d 1192, 108 Ohio St. 3d 532 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

844 N.E.2d 1192 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related