State v. Williams

75 N.C. 134
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 15, 1876·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Bynum, J.

When the prosecutrix refused to submit to the ceremony of expulsion established by this benevolent Society, it could not be lawfully inflicted. Rules of discipline for this and all voluntary associations must conform to the laws. If the act of tying this woman would have been a battery had the parties concerned not been members of the Society of “ Good Samaritans,” it is not the less a [136] battery because they were all members of that humane institution. The punishment inflicted upon the person of the prosecutrix was wilful, violent and against her consent, and thus contained all the elemenis of a wanton breach of the peace. Bell v. Hansly, 3 Jones, 131.

There is no error. This will be certified.

Pee Cueiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 75 N.C. 134 (N.C. 1876).

75 N.C. 134 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Adams
264 S.E.2d 46 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1980)
Jumper v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of World
127 F. 635 (Fifth Circuit, 1904)
Bear v. Heasley
24 L.R.A. 615 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1893)
Van Houten v. Pine
36 N.J. Eq. 133 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1882)