State v. . Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Williams

9 N.C. 100

DecidedJune 5, 1822

StatusPublished

This text of 9 N.C. 100 (State v. . Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Williams, 9 N.C. 100 (N.C. 1822).

Pincite

Opinion

Hall, Judge,

said, bad any accident happened in this case, over which the Defendant reasonably could not have been expected to leave any control, which prevented him from bringing up his appeal, it would be the duty of this Couid to grant the writ of certiorari, as prayed for $ but. that has not been the case; be trusted to anuí her \,> <]<> what he. ought 1o have done himself, and as that trust has been improperly placed, he mu«t abide the consequence. I think the writ prayed for cannot bo granted.

And of this opinion were the other Jui?e33s„ So the writ was refused-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall, Judge,

said, bad any accident happened in this case, over which the Defendant reasonably could not have been expected to leave any control, which prevented him from bringing up his appeal, it would be the duty of this Couid to grant the writ of certiorari, as prayed for $ but. that has not been the case; be trusted to anuí her \,> <]<> what he. ought 1o have done himself, and as that trust has been improperly placed, he mu«t abide the consequence. I think the writ prayed for cannot bo granted.

And of this opinion were the other Jui?e33s„ So the writ was refused-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 N.C. 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-williams-nc-1822.