State v. Williams

22 S.W. 1104, 117 Mo. 379, 1893 Mo. LEXIS 351
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided June 27, 1893·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Gantt, P. J.

— The indictment in this ease was returned by the grand jury of Lawrence county on the fourth day of February, 1891. The defendant was convicted at the October term, 1891. The bill of exceptions was filed January 19, 1892, and the clerk of the circuit court of Barry county, certified this record on the thirtieth day of January, 1892, and yet this transcript was not filed in this court for want of docket fee until May 2, 1893.

There was no arraignment of defendant before he was put on trial, and, of course, this cause must be reversed, for that reason.

It would seem that some method should be adopted to prevent a recurrence of this delay in a criminal case. The defendant should not be permitted to delay a public prosecution by simply neglecting to. pay the docket fee.

A rule or this court recently adopted requires the clerks to promptly certify these appeals, or be held in contempt; but when they have done their duty, no reason can be given why the appeal in the present condition of this docket should not be speedily heard and determined.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

All the judges of this division concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 22 S.W. 1104, 117 Mo. 379, 1893 Mo. LEXIS 351 (Mo. 1893).

22 S.W. 1104 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. O'Kelley
167 S.W. 980 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1914)
State v. Vaughn
122 S.W. 677 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1909)
State v. Llewellyn
67 S.W. 677 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1902)
Barker v. State
74 N.W. 427 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)
State v. Hopper
44 S.W. 272 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1898)
State v. Hull
73 Mo. App. 300 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1898)
Shelp v. United States
81 F. 694 (Ninth Circuit, 1897)