State v. Williams

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Williams

22 So. 759, 49 La. Ann. 1148, 1897 La. LEXIS 406

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 25, 1897

DocketNo. 12,498

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 22 So. 759 (State v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Williams, 22 So. 759, 49 La. Ann. 1148, 1897 La. LEXIS 406 (La. 1897).

Pincite

Opinions

The opinion of the court was delivered by Nicholls, C. J., and banded down May 10, 1897.

The first bill reserved was to the ruling of the court on the challenge for cause of Anatole Hebert, one of the jurors drawn from the regular panel.

The bill of exception, as presented to the court, alleges that the juror on. his voir dire said that he had formed an opinion, which was a fixed one. The able and impartial judge of the lower court, before signing the bill, added that he did not remember that the juror had said that his opinion was a -fixed one, but that if he did he could not have meant to convey the meaning of what the words imply, as he had answered the judge that he could try the case impartially.

. The defendant prosecutes this appeal. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by Nicholls, C. J., and banded down May 10, 1897.

The first bill reserved was to the ruling of the court on the challenge for cause of Anatole Hebert, one of the jurors drawn from the regular panel.

The bill of exception, as presented to the court, alleges that the juror on. his voir dire said that he had formed an opinion, which was a fixed one. The able and impartial judge of the lower court, before signing the bill, added that he did not remember that the juror had said that his opinion was a -fixed one, but that if he did he could not have meant to convey the meaning of what the words imply, as he had answered the judge that he could try the case impartially.

. The defendant prosecutes this appeal. '

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 So. 759, 49 La. Ann. 1148, 1897 La. LEXIS 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-williams-la-1897.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack