State v. Williams

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Williams

652 So. 2d 517, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3515, 1995 WL 150255

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 7, 1995

DocketNo. 94-1514

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 652 So. 2d 517 (State v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Williams, 652 So. 2d 517, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3515, 1995 WL 150255 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PETERSON, Judge.

We vacate the “reverse split sentence” which was imposed upon the appellant without contemporaneous written reasons for the downward departure, and we remand for sentencing within the guidelines. § 948.01(11), Fla.Stat. (1991); Bell v. State, 651 So.2d 237 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); State v. Disbrow, 626 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), approved, 642 So.2d 740 (Fla.1994).

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

HARRIS, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PETERSON, Judge.

We vacate the “reverse split sentence” which was imposed upon the appellant without contemporaneous written reasons for the downward departure, and we remand for sentencing within the guidelines. § 948.01(11), Fla.Stat. (1991); Bell v. State, 651 So.2d 237 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); State v. Disbrow, 626 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), approved, 642 So.2d 740 (Fla.1994).

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

HARRIS, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

652 So. 2d 517, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3515, 1995 WL 150255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-williams-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack