State v. Williams

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Williams

652 So. 2d 517, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3515, 1995 WL 150255

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 7, 1995·No. No. 94-1514·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PETERSON, Judge.

We vacate the “reverse split sentence” which was imposed upon the appellant without contemporaneous written reasons for the downward departure, and we remand for sentencing within the guidelines. § 948.01(11), Fla.Stat. (1991); Bell v. State, 651 So.2d 237 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); State v. Disbrow, 626 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), approved, 642 So.2d 740 (Fla.1994).

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

HARRIS, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PETERSON, Judge.

We vacate the “reverse split sentence” which was imposed upon the appellant without contemporaneous written reasons for the downward departure, and we remand for sentencing within the guidelines. § 948.01(11), Fla.Stat. (1991); Bell v. State, 651 So.2d 237 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); State v. Disbrow, 626 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), approved, 642 So.2d 740 (Fla.1994).

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

HARRIS, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur.

State v. Williams, 652 So. 2d 517, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3515, 1995 WL 150255 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

652 So. 2d 517 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related