State v. Williams

477 So. 2d 570, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 569, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3925
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 17, 1985·No. No. 66288·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

OVERTON, Justice.

This is a petition to review Williams v. State, 462 So.2d 23 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), remanding respondent’s case for resentenc-ing because of the trial court’s use of prior convictions as the reason for departure from the sentencing guidelines and certifying the following question as a matter of great public importance:

If the scoresheets make provision for prior convictions, can those convictions also constitute clear and convincing reasons for aggravated punishment outside the guidelines?

Id. at 24. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We answered the question in Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218, (Fla.1985), in which we held that, since prior convictions are already factored in as a part of the presumptive guidelines sentence, they may not be used as a clear and convincing reason for departure. See also Deer v. State, 476 So.2d 163 (Fla.1985); Gregory v. State, 475 So.2d 1221 (Fla.1985).

Accordingly, we approve the decision of the district court.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 477 So. 2d 570, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 569, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3925 (Fla. 1985).

477 So. 2d 570 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watkins v. State
498 So. 2d 576 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Safford v. State
488 So. 2d 141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Campbell v. State
486 So. 2d 61 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Irving v. State
484 So. 2d 78 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Smith v. State
482 So. 2d 469 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)