State v. Williams

Arizona Supreme Court

State v. Williams

831 P.2d 1279, 171 Ariz. 511, 1992 Ariz. LEXIS 45

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedJune 23, 1992

DocketNo. CR-92-0074-PR

StatusPublished

This text of 831 P.2d 1279 (State v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Williams, 831 P.2d 1279, 171 Ariz. 511, 1992 Ariz. LEXIS 45 (Ark. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Petition for Review was considered by the Court on June 16, 1992. On consideration,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Review is granted as to issue 2 and denied as to all other issues.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the law firm of Meyer, Hendricks, Victor, Osbom & Maledon is appointed to represent Appellant in this matter.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall brief the following issue: Was Appellant’s sentence enhancement pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-604.01(K) proper when the statute permits enhancement for crimes “committed against” a child under the age of fifteen years, and the facts of this case may show a course of conduct not intended to cause injury to any person?

Counsel for Appellant shall file a brief, in accordance with Rule 14, Ariz.R.Civ.App. P., 17B A.R.S., directed to the foregoing issue on or before September 15, 1992. The State may file a response within forty-five days after Appellant’s brief is filed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that when the case is at issue, it will be set for oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI