State v. Wilkins

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Wilkins

863 N.E.2d 590, 113 Ohio St. 3d 170

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 11, 2007·No. No. 2005-2158·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Buehler, 113 Ohio St.3d 114, 2007-Ohio-1246, 863 N.E.2d 124.

Sherri B. Walsh, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard S. Kasay, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. David H. Bodiker, Ohio Public Defender, and John A. Bay, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Moyer, C. J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents for the reasons stated in her dissenting opinion in State v. Buehler.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Buehler, 113 Ohio St.3d 114, 2007-Ohio-1246, 863 N.E.2d 124.

Sherri B. Walsh, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard S. Kasay, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. David H. Bodiker, Ohio Public Defender, and John A. Bay, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Moyer, C. J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents for the reasons stated in her dissenting opinion in State v. Buehler.

State v. Wilkins, 863 N.E.2d 590, 113 Ohio St. 3d 170 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

863 N.E.2d 590 (State v. Wilkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related