State v. Wilkins

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Wilkins

863 N.E.2d 590, 113 Ohio St. 3d 170

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 11, 2007

DocketNo. 2005-2158

StatusPublished

This text of 863 N.E.2d 590 (State v. Wilkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wilkins, 863 N.E.2d 590, 113 Ohio St. 3d 170 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Buehler, 113 Ohio St.3d 114, 2007-Ohio-1246, 863 N.E.2d 124.

Sherri B. Walsh, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard S. Kasay, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. David H. Bodiker, Ohio Public Defender, and John A. Bay, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Moyer, C. J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents for the reasons stated in her dissenting opinion in State v. Buehler.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Buehler, 113 Ohio St.3d 114, 2007-Ohio-1246, 863 N.E.2d 124.

Sherri B. Walsh, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard S. Kasay, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. David H. Bodiker, Ohio Public Defender, and John A. Bay, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Moyer, C. J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents for the reasons stated in her dissenting opinion in State v. Buehler.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

863 N.E.2d 590, 113 Ohio St. 3d 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wilkins-ohio-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack