State v. Wilhelm

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Wilhelm

800 S.W.2d 149, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1774, 1990 WL 197705

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 11, 1990

DocketNo. WD 42943

StatusPublished

This text of 800 S.W.2d 149 (State v. Wilhelm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wilhelm, 800 S.W.2d 149, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1774, 1990 WL 197705 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Defendant appeals from convictions of first degree assault and second degree assault, §§ 565.050, 565.060, RSMo 1986, in his second trial after the decision was remanded for instructional error in State v. Wilhelm, 774 S.W.2d 512 (Mo.App.1989). Defendant now claims the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal because the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Defendant appeals from convictions of first degree assault and second degree assault, §§ 565.050, 565.060, RSMo 1986, in his second trial after the decision was remanded for instructional error in State v. Wilhelm, 774 S.W.2d 512 (Mo.App.1989). Defendant now claims the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal because the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

800 S.W.2d 149, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1774, 1990 WL 197705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wilhelm-moctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack