State v. Wiley-El

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Wiley-El

945 S.W.2d 43, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 755

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 29, 1997

DocketNos. 68535, 70739

StatusPublished

This text of 945 S.W.2d 43 (State v. Wiley-El) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wiley-El, 945 S.W.2d 43, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 755 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of distributing a controlled substance near public housing in violation of § 195.218, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him to fifteen years.

He appeals, raising two plain error points and one point challenging the constitutionality of the statute. The Missouri Supreme Court found the statute constitutional in State v. Hatton, 918 S.W.2d 790 (Mo.banc 1996). In addition, in his Rule 29.15 proceeding, he raises one point alleging ineffective assistance of counsel.

We have examined the legal file, transcript, and briefs. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Rule 30.25(b). The judgment of the motion court in the Rule 29.15 proceeding is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b). The judgments are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI