State v. Wiley, 2007-P-0069 (10-19-2007)

2007 Ohio 5608
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 19, 2007
DocketNo. 2007-P-0069.
StatusPublished

This text of 2007 Ohio 5608 (State v. Wiley, 2007-P-0069 (10-19-2007)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Wiley, 2007-P-0069 (10-19-2007), 2007 Ohio 5608 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION
{¶ 1} On August 3, 2007, appellant, Curtis D. Wiley, pro se, filed a notice of appeal from a June 22, 2007 judgment of the Portage County Court of Common Pleas denying his motion for judicial release. Appellant's notice of appeal was due to be filed by Monday, July 23, 2007, which was not a holiday or a weekend. Thus, his appeal was untimely filed.

{¶ 2} More importantly, in addition to being untimely, the June 22, 2007 judgment is not a final appealable order. The Supreme Court of Ohio has held that the denial of a motion for judicial release is not a final appealable order. State v. Coffman, *Page 2 91 Ohio St. 3d 125, 2001-Ohio-296. Therefore, in the instant matter, since appellant's appeal involves the denial of a motion for judicial release, there is no final appealable order.

{¶ 3} Based upon the foregoing analysis, this appeal is hereby sua sponte dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

{¶ 4} Appeal dismissed.

CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, P.J., DIANE V. GRENDELL, J., concur.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Coffman
742 N.E.2d 644 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2007 Ohio 5608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wiley-2007-p-0069-10-19-2007-ohioctapp-2007.