State v. Wilcox

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Wilcox

829 S.W.2d 58, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 588, 1992 WL 66740

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 7, 1992·No. No. 60043·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of burglary in the second degree. We affirm. Defendant failed to preserve his point for review and we find no plain error by the trial court. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of burglary in the second degree. We affirm. Defendant failed to preserve his point for review and we find no plain error by the trial court. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Wilcox, 829 S.W.2d 58, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 588, 1992 WL 66740 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

829 S.W.2d 58 (State v. Wilcox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.