State v. Wilburn

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Wilburn

361 S.W.3d 12, 2010 WL 4961715, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 596

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 4, 2010

DocketED 93098

StatusPublished

This text of 361 S.W.3d 12 (State v. Wilburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wilburn, 361 S.W.3d 12, 2010 WL 4961715, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 596 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Emzile L. Wilburn appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of forcible rape, Section 566.030 RSMo 2000, forcible sodomy, Section 566.060 RSMo 2000; kidnapping, Section 565.110 RSMo 2000; second-degree assault, Section 565.060 RSMo 2000; and four counts of armed criminal action, Sec *13 tion 571.015 RSMo 2000. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Emzile L. Wilburn appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of forcible rape, Section 566.030 RSMo 2000, forcible sodomy, Section 566.060 RSMo 2000; kidnapping, Section 565.110 RSMo 2000; second-degree assault, Section 565.060 RSMo 2000; and four counts of armed criminal action, Sec *13 tion 571.015 RSMo 2000. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

361 S.W.3d 12, 2010 WL 4961715, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wilburn-moctapp-2010.