State v. Wilburn

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Wilburn

575 S.W.2d 914, 1978 Mo. App. LEXIS 2747

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 27, 1978

DocketNo. 39703

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 575 S.W.2d 914 (State v. Wilburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wilburn, 575 S.W.2d 914, 1978 Mo. App. LEXIS 2747 (Mo. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

CRIST, Judge.

Defendant was found guilty by a jury of Illegal Possession of a Controlled Substance, Schedule I — heroin. The court, utilizing the Second Offender Act and the penalty provisions of the Narcotic Drug Act, assessed his punishment at twenty years confinement in the Missouri Department of Corrections.

On February 23, 1976, defendant was charged with felonious possession of heroin. On June 4, 1976, a second amended information was filed. Defendant was additionally charged with two prior convictions, possession of a narcotic drug and illegal sale of a narcotic drug. Trial began on September 6, 1977.

Defendant complains of the amended charges of the two prior convictions for the reason that it pleaded a new and more severe offense in violation of Rule 24.02. We disagree.

The purpose of the amendment was to make the Second Offender Act and the penalty provisions of the Narcotic Drug Act applicable in assessing punishment. No new offense or crime was charged by the amendment. We have previously spoken on this issue. State v. Shumate, 516 S.W.2d 297 (Mo.App.1974); see § 195.200, subsection 3 RSMo. Supp. 1975.

The judgment is affirmed.

DOWD, P. J., and STOCKARD, Special Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI