State v. Wilborn

92 S.E.2d 148, 243 N.C. 756, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 620
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 11, 1956
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 92 S.E.2d 148 (State v. Wilborn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Wilborn, 92 S.E.2d 148, 243 N.C. 756, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 620 (N.C. 1956).

Opinion

PeR Curiam.

The defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to go to the jury and that his motion for judgment as of nonsuit should have been allowed. The evidence was amply sufficient to sustain the verdict. The assignments of error do not present questions of law which require discussion.

No error.

DeviN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bray v. Cross
106 S.E.2d 315 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 S.E.2d 148, 243 N.C. 756, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wilborn-nc-1956.