State v. Wilborn

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

State v. Wilborn

CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 6, 2022

DocketCAAP-22-0000032

StatusPublished

This text of State v. Wilborn (State v. Wilborn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wilborn, (hawapp 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 06-JUN-2022 07:50 AM Dkt. 22 OGMD NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

STATE OF HAWAI I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROBERTA WILBORN, Defendant-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CRIMINAL NO. 1CPC-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION (By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth and Nakasone, JJ.) Upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Appellate Jurisdiction (Motion), filed by Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawai i, on April 11, 2022, the papers in support, and the record, it appears that we lack jurisdiction over Defendant- Appellant Roberta Wilborn's (Wilborn) appeal from Case No. 1CPC- XX-XXXXXXX because the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (circuit court) has not entered a final, appealable order or judgment and the appeal is premature. Wilborn appears to appeal from the circuit court's September 22, 2021 Order Granting Motion for Mental Examination to Determine [Wilborn]'s Fitness to Proceed and Penal Responsibility. The circuit court did not certify the order for interlocutory appeal. "It is well-settled that the right to appeal is purely statutory and exists only when given by some constitutional or statutory provision." Burke v. Cty. of Maui, 95 Hawai i 288, 289, 22 P.3d 84, 85 (2001). There is no statutory right to appeal under Hawaii Revised Statutes chapter 704 when a defendant NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

is ordered to undergo an evaluation to determine fitness to proceed or penal responsibility. There is no appealable order or final judgment in the record on appeal. Therefore, this court lacks appellate jurisdiction. Further, Nelson W. Goo, Wilborn's court-appointed counsel, whom the circuit court did not appoint as standby counsel, has not withdrawn or been discharged from representing Wilborn. See State v. Hirano, 8 Haw. App. 330, 333-36, 802 P.2d 482, 484-85 (1990). Therefore, Wilborn improperly filed the notice of appeal self-represented. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion is granted in part and the appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, June 6, 2022.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Presiding Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 06-JUN-2022 07:50 AM Dkt. 22 OGMD NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

STATE OF HAWAI I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROBERTA WILBORN, Defendant-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CRIMINAL NO. 1CPC-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION (By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth and Nakasone, JJ.) Upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Appellate Jurisdiction (Motion), filed by Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawai i, on April 11, 2022, the papers in support, and the record, it appears that we lack jurisdiction over Defendant- Appellant Roberta Wilborn's (Wilborn) appeal from Case No. 1CPC- XX-XXXXXXX because the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (circuit court) has not entered a final, appealable order or judgment and the appeal is premature. Wilborn appears to appeal from the circuit court's September 22, 2021 Order Granting Motion for Mental Examination to Determine [Wilborn]'s Fitness to Proceed and Penal Responsibility. The circuit court did not certify the order for interlocutory appeal. "It is well-settled that the right to appeal is purely statutory and exists only when given by some constitutional or statutory provision." Burke v. Cty. of Maui, 95 Hawai i 288, 289, 22 P.3d 84, 85 (2001). There is no statutory right to appeal under Hawaii Revised Statutes chapter 704 when a defendant NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

is ordered to undergo an evaluation to determine fitness to proceed or penal responsibility. There is no appealable order or final judgment in the record on appeal. Therefore, this court lacks appellate jurisdiction. Further, Nelson W. Goo, Wilborn's court-appointed counsel, whom the circuit court did not appoint as standby counsel, has not withdrawn or been discharged from representing Wilborn. See State v. Hirano, 8 Haw. App. 330, 333-36, 802 P.2d 482, 484-85 (1990). Therefore, Wilborn improperly filed the notice of appeal self-represented. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion is granted in part and the appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, June 6, 2022.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Presiding Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Wilborn, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wilborn-hawapp-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack