State v. Wightman
14 So. 3d 211, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 391, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 986, 2009 WL 1884713
Opinion
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in Wightman v. State, 982 So.2d 74 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008), based on express and direct conflict with State v. Generazio, 691 So.2d 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), and Lazarowicz v. State, 561 So.2d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). After further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss review.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Wightman, 14 So. 3d 211, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 391, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 986, 2009 WL 1884713 (Fla. 2009).
14 So. 3d 211 (State v. Wightman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wightman v. State
982 So. 2d 74 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
State v. Generazio
691 So. 2d 609 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Lazarowicz v. State
561 So. 2d 392 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)