State v. Wiebking
This text of 511 A.2d 438 (State v. Wiebking) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Jeffrey Wiebking, representing himself, appeals his conviction of escape, 17-A M.R. S.A. § 755 (1981 & Supp.1985), entered after a jury trial in Superior Court (Piscata-quis County). His sole contention on appeal is that he was denied his statutory right to be brought to trial within 180 days after his demand pursuant to 34-A M.R. S.A. § 3042 (Pamph.1985). Defendant’s trial did not commence until 467 days after he filed his statutory demand for trial. Delay attributable to defendant, however, may not be counted against the 180-day time limit prescribed by section 3042. See State v. Heald, 393 A.2d 537, 543-44 (Me.1978) (construing 34 M.R.S.A. § 1391, the predecessor of section 3042). During the 467-day period, defendant filed a variety of pretrial motions, including ones for continuances, for leave to proceed pro se, and for transfer to another county for plea and sentence. On this record he does not establish that he himself was free of responsibility for delaying the trial beyond 180 days.
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
511 A.2d 438, 1986 Me. LEXIS 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wiebking-me-1986.