State v. . Widenhouse

71 N.C. 279
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 71 N.C. 279 (State v. . Widenhouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Widenhouse, 71 N.C. 279 (N.C. 1874).

Opinion

Settle, J.

All the questions presented by the record in this case are discussed and well decided in State v. Buckner, Phil., 558.

It is there held that where the land on both sides of the road, whether public or private, belongs to the prosecutor, he is the owner of the soil over which the road runs, and persons who stop upon such road and use violent and menacing language to him are guilty of forcible trespass.

The only privilege which the public have in a public road is that of passing over it, and those who abuse that privilege become trespassers ab mitio.

Let it be certified that there is error, to the end that the Superior Court may proceed to judgment upon the special verdict.

Pee Cubiam. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saunders v. . Gilbert
72 S.E. 610 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1911)
State v. . Talbot
2 S.E. 148 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 N.C. 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-widenhouse-nc-1874.