State v. Wideman

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Wideman

308 S.W.3d 771, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 546, 2010 WL 1686187

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 27, 2010

DocketED 92971

StatusPublished

This text of 308 S.W.3d 771 (State v. Wideman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wideman, 308 S.W.3d 771, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 546, 2010 WL 1686187 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Edward Wideman (Defendant) appeals the judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of two counts of statutory rape in the second degree and two counts of statutory sodomy in the second degree. Defendant claims the trial court plainly erred in overruling his request to exclude the victim from the courtroom and permitting her to remain in the courtroom before she testified and throughout the proceedings. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no plain error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI