State v. Wickizer

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Wickizer

527 S.W.3d 126, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 848, 2017 WL 3707044

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 29, 2017

DocketWD 79627

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 527 S.W.3d 126 (State v. Wickizer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Wickizer, 527 S.W.3d 126, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 848, 2017 WL 3707044 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Following a jury trial, Buddy Wickizer appeals the trial court’s decision to admit certain testimony given by the victim’s grandmother, Wickizer argues the testimony was inadmissible hearsay because Grandmother was not disclosed under § 491.075 as a witness who would testify about the victim’s out-of-court statements and because Grandmother’s testimony was not admissible under the hearsay exception recognized by § 491.075, We affirm. Rule 30.25(b),

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Following a jury trial, Buddy Wickizer appeals the trial court’s decision to admit certain testimony given by the victim’s grandmother, Wickizer argues the testimony was inadmissible hearsay because Grandmother was not disclosed under § 491.075 as a witness who would testify about the victim’s out-of-court statements and because Grandmother’s testimony was not admissible under the hearsay exception recognized by § 491.075, We affirm. Rule 30.25(b),

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

527 S.W.3d 126, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 848, 2017 WL 3707044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wickizer-moctapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack