State v. Wichman

262 A.2d 276, 6 Conn. Cir. Ct. 13, 1969 Conn. Cir. LEXIS 138
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided December 12, 1969·No. File No. MV 3-32397·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is before us at this time on the state’s motion to dismiss the appeal. The appeal, inter alia, is based upon the claim that the defendant was denied a speedy trial. “Whether an accused has been denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial depends upon the facts in the particular case.” State v. Holloway, 147 Conn. 22, 25. Upon the record as presented, we have no way of knowing whether or not the defendant’s constitutional right was violated. In these circumstances, the state’s motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

DiCenzo, Casale and Jacobs, Js., participated in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wichman, 262 A.2d 276, 6 Conn. Cir. Ct. 13, 1969 Conn. Cir. LEXIS 138 (Colo. Ct. App. 1969).

262 A.2d 276 (State v. Wichman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Holloway
156 A.2d 466 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1959)