State v. Wichman
This text of 262 A.2d 276 (State v. Wichman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case is before us at this time on the state’s motion to dismiss the appeal. The appeal, inter alia, is based upon the claim that the defendant was denied a speedy trial. “Whether an accused has been denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial depends upon the facts in the particular case.” State v. Holloway, 147 Conn. 22, 25. Upon the record as presented, we have no way of knowing whether or not the defendant’s constitutional right was violated. In these circumstances, the state’s motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.
DiCenzo, Casale and Jacobs, Js., participated in this decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 A.2d 276, 6 Conn. Cir. Ct. 13, 1969 Conn. Cir. LEXIS 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-wichman-connappct-1969.