State v. Whitworth

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Whitworth

389 S.W.3d 747, 2013 WL 216371, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 81

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 22, 2013·No. No. WD 74325·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Mark Whitworth appeals from his conviction of one count of forcible rape, § 566.030, one count of statutory rape in the first degree, § 566.032, one count of statutory sodomy in the first degree, § 566.062, one count of incest, § 568.020, and one count of child molestation in the first degree, § 566.067. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion. However, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Mark Whitworth appeals from his conviction of one count of forcible rape, § 566.030, one count of statutory rape in the first degree, § 566.032, one count of statutory sodomy in the first degree, § 566.062, one count of incest, § 568.020, and one count of child molestation in the first degree, § 566.067. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion. However, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Whitworth, 389 S.W.3d 747, 2013 WL 216371, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 81 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

389 S.W.3d 747 (State v. Whitworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.