State v. Whitt

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Whitt

366 S.W.3d 556, 2012 WL 944711, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 350

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 20, 2012

DocketED 96379

StatusPublished

This text of 366 S.W.3d 556 (State v. Whitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Whitt, 366 S.W.3d 556, 2012 WL 944711, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 350 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David T. Whitt appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree property damage. We find that the trial court did not clearly err in overruling Whitt’s Batson challenge to the State’s peremptory strike of venireper-son Mantreal Butler. We also find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling Whitt’s request for a mistrial after the court proceeded with the trial in his absence.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum set *557 ting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David T. Whitt appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree property damage. We find that the trial court did not clearly err in overruling Whitt’s Batson challenge to the State’s peremptory strike of venireper-son Mantreal Butler. We also find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling Whitt’s request for a mistrial after the court proceeded with the trial in his absence.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum set *557 ting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

366 S.W.3d 556, 2012 WL 944711, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-whitt-moctapp-2012.