State v. Whitney

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Whitney

202 S.W.3d 56, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1403, 2006 WL 2729112

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 26, 2006

DocketED 86055

StatusPublished

This text of 202 S.W.3d 56 (State v. Whitney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Whitney, 202 S.W.3d 56, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1403, 2006 WL 2729112 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

*57 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Timothy Whitney, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of statutory rape in the first degree, in violation of section 566.032 RSMo (2000). The trial court sentenced him to ten years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*57 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Timothy Whitney, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of statutory rape in the first degree, in violation of section 566.032 RSMo (2000). The trial court sentenced him to ten years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 S.W.3d 56, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1403, 2006 WL 2729112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-whitney-moctapp-2006.