State v. Whitney

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Whitney

202 S.W.3d 56, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1403, 2006 WL 2729112

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 26, 2006·No. ED 86055·Published

Opinion

*57 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Timothy Whitney, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of statutory rape in the first degree, in violation of section 566.032 RSMo (2000). The trial court sentenced him to ten years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*57 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Timothy Whitney, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of statutory rape in the first degree, in violation of section 566.032 RSMo (2000). The trial court sentenced him to ten years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Whitney, 202 S.W.3d 56, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1403, 2006 WL 2729112 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

202 S.W.3d 56 (State v. Whitney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.