State v. Whitley

731 S.E.2d 157, 366 N.C. 237, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 742, 2012 WL 3711379
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Whitley. Read the opinion of the Court — 684 S.E.2d 40
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided August 23, 2012·No. 168P09-8·Published

Opinion

1. Def’s Pro Se Motion for Writ of Mandamus (COAP11-794)

2. Def’s Pro Se Motion for Declaratory Judgment

3. Def’s Pro Se Motion for Clarification

4. Def’s Pro Se Motion for Enforcement of Plea Agreement and Judgment and Commitment

1. Denied

2. Dismissed

3. Dismissed

4. Dismissed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Whitley, 731 S.E.2d 157, 366 N.C. 237, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 742, 2012 WL 3711379 (N.C. 2012).

731 S.E.2d 157 (State v. Whitley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.