State v. Whitfield
This text of 544 S.W.3d 305 (State v. Whitfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant, Dominique Whitfield, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following his conviction by a jury of voluntary manslaughter, in violation of section 565.023 *306RSMo. (2000 & Supp. 2014), and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo. (2016). The trial court imposed the jury's recommended sentences of fifteen years of imprisonment for voluntary manslaughter and four years for armed criminal action, and ordered the sentences served concurrently. Finding no error, we affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
We affirm the trial court's judgment. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
544 S.W.3d 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-whitfield-moctapp-2018.